You, or someone, states that BF research receivced a "major Blow" because
Ray Wallace's sons
said he had made all the BF tracks in the PNW.
Only a fool, or a newspaper man,accepts such claims as is.
I knew Wallace... it is impossible to make a mark with these unflexible
"feet" and they also cannot
penetrate the soil, since they SPREAD OUT THE WEIGHT.
BONK!
Now, note new Bigfoot photo-
PRESS RELEASE - FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
The Bigfoot Investigators & Researchers Organization
Box 9502,Berkeley,CA 94709 510-878-2468
After quality printing and enhancement, a Bigfoot photo taken recently on an expedition in CA
can now be shown. This finding lends support to Idaho State University professor Dr. Jeffery Meldrum
and his controversial position that such creatures do exist. Dr. Meldrum is under fire by a committee
of 30 other professors who feel his research is inappropriate for ISU.
Photos - view at
http://www.bigfootforums.net/septexpedition.htmlBigfoot was photographed while unseen in High Sierras of CA, when members of
a camping trip
encountered screams by a possible Bigfoot in response to "Call blasting"
of other Bigfoot screams, and found several old Bigfoot tracks. However,
during a walk around the other side of a pond at the El Dorado National Forest
Site, ( between Stockton and Lake Tahoe) Jon-Erik Beckjord investigated a spot where girlfriend Chris Pitts
had seen a brief flash of what seemed like Bigfoot from the previous day,
and while standing there, took several photos of the campsite looking
across the pond. In two photos in 35mm color, using a pocket camera, there
appears to be a Bigfoot creature standing by a camp vehicle, looking back
at the camera. A head, torso, and a well-muscled arm are visible. Also, many people
are able to see a male organ on the creature in the photo. (Note - there was a tent rope to the tree, on which a pair of
white shorts were drying. Also the tent rope supported a blue tarp. Let there be no absurd comments
about the drying shorts, they had nothing to do with the creature but they did obscure part of the abdomen.) The head
has a strong and wide nose. In one shot, Ms Pitts is standing 30 feet away
and in the other, she is not visible. The film was 200 asa Kodak color print film. Shot 5 was normal view, and shot 6 was telephoto. Beckjord, the
photographer, did not see the creature, some 200 feet away, as often happens
at this site during previous expeditions. Assuming the car is 5.5 ft in height, the creature looks to be about 10 ft. For some reason,
these creatures feel safer when men are out of the camp area, such as across a creek or pond, at least 200 feet away. (Perhaps
they are traumatized by deer hunters with rifles, and are cautious.) In any case, they are more timid than chimps
at Gombe Stream, where Dr. Jane Goodall did her research. Dr. Goodall has stated several times that she feels there is
possibility that such large primates as these may inhabit North America.
Several biologists have viewed the image, and one has been willing to make a limited statement. Dr. Thomas Tomasi
of SW Missouri State Univ., says that it looks to him like "a large unidentified primate".
People on the street, of all backgrounds, from doctors to clerks, say: "What's that big monkey?"
Queries can be made at 510-878-2468 with email
[email protected]Photo is (c)2006 Jon-Erik Beckjord but press can have one-time use at no charge.
Contact info: Jon-Erik Beckjord,(Mensa member)(Berkeley MBA)(Eagle Scout & former USAF Academy cadet under Honor System)
(We mention this since several skeptics have accused us of fraud, as they always do in all cases, and this background
listed relates to the BSA and cadet honor systems. We tell no lies and will take a lie detector test.)
510-878-2468 - ///cell 510-575-5887
Master shot at 200 ft. Frame no 6. 35mm Kodak Gold., ASA 200. 50 mm lens.
Close up of car area.
White object is underwear that is hanging on a clothesline. The same clothesline supports a blue tarp.
Red circle is over male organ. Lower white object is hood of car. On the right is a dark tree trunk. The photo
shows first the tree trunk, then the tarp and underwear, then the car, and then Bigfoot. Bigfoot is standing next
to a large ice chest of food that was left on the far side of the car, but on the ground and not visible here.
Long photo cropped to show Ms Pitts on rt in blue shirt, and Bigfoot by car, on left by tree. The green brush seen in the center obscured
her view of the Bigfoot.
Head -Sierra Campground BF Patterson-Gimlin film 1967 Bigfoot head -- Somewhat similar to each other for first time.
Grainy? Well, the range was 200 feet. The enlargement is over 200 x. Any such enlargement will seem grainy. Bigfoot does not
stand and pose, like a cow or squirrel.
(c) 2006 Jon-Erik Beckjord -one time free use permitted per outlet.
There is 100% no fakery involved here. Will take lie detector test if needed.
Photoshop not used, this was from original 35mm neg. which a lab can examine.
We have such a lab in San Francisco, with experts available. Beckjord is
a photographer and Pitts is an erotic artist.
WHY IS ENLARGEMENT FUZZY? Enlargement is 200 x enlarged and distance was 200 feet. Of course it is
fuzzy. Take a photo of a friend on the other side of a football field, and see what you get.
email us or call - 510-787-5887 cell - 510-575-5887 VM 415-289-2277