Page 1 of 1

Ancient Technology & Clay Airplanes

PostPosted: December 20th, 2007, 10:50 am
by Liv
So last night Journeyman ended with a bang. The guy comes on and asks about time travel and says "How do you think the Inca's built clay airplanes", or "....built atomic weapons, thousands of years ago."

Okay...(Next Morning) I'm looking it up... Sure enough. I come to this page.

Was there once an advanced civilization on Earth? A civilization
that achieved a level of technology roughly equivalent to our own, perhaps even more advanced in some fields?

Why not? We as a species have existed for well over a million years. Our current civilization is
only about eight thousand years old. Of course, the first objection that comes to mind is that it is hard to believe that such a civilization could have existed and leave absolutely no evidence of its existence.

We should consider, however, that even large cities would be lost, disintegrated or covered over in just a few hundred years. After a few thousand years, there would be little left to find. But, we're not talking a few thousand years here, we are talking about tens of thousands of years. Still, you would think that SOMETHING would have survived. Well, maybe it did.

Stories may have been handed down. Technology may have been passed from generation to generation over the years and through the centuries and millennia.


inca_airplane.jpg

Okay, here's the Inca clay airplane. Actually gold according to the site, which claims aerospace engineers during the 1960's have concluded that this is a design capable of flight. Assuming it merely represents a bird, they were classified (according to the site) as "zoomorphic". Some disagree though, as the image clearly represents a vertical stabilizer similar to modern aircraft. Birds and bugs don't have these, so what is it?

There also seems to be a windshield like protrusion at the front. Behind the "windshield" is what appears to be a cockpit with a seat. Next to the "windshield" are knobs that suggest forward facing lights.

Similar objects have been found in Colombia, Costa Rica, Venezuela and Peru. Scientists and engineers have studied the objects and concluded they seem more artificial than natural.


The article suggests that one only need to look at the Egytian Saqqara glider as further proof of a functional ancient airplane. Though North Carolina claims it's "First in Flight", it appear that same crazy race of people who built the great pyramids also invented the airplane.
saqqara_glider_bird_of_prey.jpg
saqqara_glider_bird_of_prey.jpg (10.83 KiB) Viewed 7666 times


During the late 1800's the Saqqara Bird Glider was discovered, forgotten, and then re-discovered in 1969. Made from Sycamore, and carbon dated to 200 B.C., It flies when thrown according to the article. Apparently, several of these have been found, enough so, that we've tossed a few in the air.

So obviously Orville and Wilbur weren't the first. You could argue that these were not "real" airplanes, but child's toys, but you clearly can't argue that they flew when thrown. They (The ancients) understood the concept, and the science of how to build flying objects, but these hieroglyphs such as these add even more questions.
hieroplanes.JPG


The above images were found on the ceiling beams of a 3000-year old New Kingdom Temple, located several hundred miles south of Cairo and the Giza Plateau, at Abydos.


All is well and good, until Spark Plugs start showing up. 500,000 YEAR OLD Spark Plugs!!!
ancient_spark_plug.jpg

Discovered in 1961, in what is modern day California, the ceramic core insulator and copper core is shockingly similar to a broke modern day spark plug found in any automobile. Look familiar?

spark_plug.jpg
spark_plug.jpg (3.69 KiB) Viewed 6465 times


Other examples of Ancient technology are given, such as the Baghdad Battery which most everyone is familiar with when made popular and proved "plausible" on Discovery Channel's "Myth Busters"

So that leads me to the second part of Journeyman... Ancient Atomic Power. I searched and searched, and it appears the main consensus on ancient atomic power has been explained away by asteroid impact. The whole argument revolves around "green glass" which appears to occur following a atomic explosion due to great pressure and heat. King tut had some of this atomic glass as part of a stone in the necklace he was buried with. Some have suggested along with the giant "nuclear bunkers" aka the pyramids, that Egyptian civilization had harnessed the power of Atomic energy. While it appears this argument currently lacks evidence, let's suspend our disbelief for a second and assume it's true. What if the pyramids are much older then the Egyptians? What if we've destroyed ourselves before because of a Nuclear war? What would that mean for us, as a race who are about to embark upon another nuclear war?

Re: Ancient Technology & Clay Airplanes

PostPosted: December 20th, 2007, 1:10 pm
by BecauseHeLives
I've always said that people of old were more intelligent than we are today. We're gettin' dumber as a "species"

Re: Ancient Technology & Clay Airplanes

PostPosted: December 20th, 2007, 2:38 pm
by Nfidel
Here is something I read about the "ancient spark plugs" http://www.ramtops.co.uk/coso.html
Seems they were spark plugs, but not ancient.

Here is a site about the "airplane hieroglyphs". http://www.catchpenny.org/abydos.html

This was all I could find on short notice.

Re: Ancient Technology & Clay Airplanes

PostPosted: December 20th, 2007, 2:42 pm
by Sanjuro
BecauseHeLives wrote:I've always said that people of old were more intelligent than we are today.



...door opened....must... not....step... through.... :lol:

Re: Ancient Technology & Clay Airplanes

PostPosted: December 20th, 2007, 2:55 pm
by Nfidel
Here is another link with a long list of ancient artifacts and discussions about them.Cult and Fringe Archaeology
I've only looked around there a little while, but I've bookmarked it for further study.

Re: Ancient Technology & Clay Airplanes

PostPosted: December 20th, 2007, 3:19 pm
by RebelSnake
This particular thread is an excellent example of people "misinterpreting their observations" as others have so eloquently stated. They want these artifacts to be something they're not so badly they don't even bother to question their initial conclusions to the eventual point of being made fools of once the truth finally comes out.

Re: Ancient Technology & Clay Airplanes

PostPosted: December 20th, 2007, 3:51 pm
by A Person
Liv wrote:let's suspend our disbelief for a second and assume it's true

Let's not for a second, lest I be accused of only treating Bible claims skeptically.

While The Saqqara Bird (Glider) soes look somthing like a plane even with the addition of a large horizontal tailplane (for which there is no evidence) does not fly at all well. I rather think it looks more like a flying fish, which the Egyptians would be familiar with and would be a more likely explanation. Image
Image
The same thing can be said for the 'Ancient Pre-Incan Airplanes' which are even closer representations of flying fish.
Image

As for the Baghdad Battery, I think that is very likely a genuine battery, but since 'Baghdad Lightbulbs' or 'Baghdad TV's" have not been found, I rather like the Mythbuster's explanation that it was used for spiritual purposes.

I can find no information on the "Clay (Gold?) Inca Plane"

The only question about the spark plug is its claim of being ancient. Since the spark plug has remarkable similarities with other early spark plugs and a 1920s Champion plug in particular the conclusion must be that since it is well known that iron objects in moist conditions are known to form concretions very rapidly, it is in fact a 1920's Champion spark plug.

Thanks to SFI for the hieroglyphics link.

I also doubt we're getting more (or less) intelligent than we were a few thousand years ago. More knowledgeable certainly and as a species, better fed so that more of us can achieve their potential.

Re: Ancient Technology & Clay Airplanes

PostPosted: December 21st, 2007, 8:17 pm
by SOertel
I cannot believe how far the human race will go to cover up what they cannot comprehend or try and cover-up the obvious. Yes, spark plugs were discorvered, hieroglyphs contained airplanes and Incas built clay airplanes. Is it really so hard to believe that there were ancient species capable of such advancement? The Earth is way older than we are and I believe these things happened and we are such a young species not all of our minds can wrap around the concept of ancient civilizations. Don't worry, when we are ready as a species we will know the truth about our planets past.

Re: Ancient Technology & Clay Airplanes

PostPosted: December 21st, 2007, 9:01 pm
by A Person
Makes you wonder what kind of engine those spark plugs were used in. Ignoring the coincidence of appearing exactly like a 1920's Champion spark plug, where are the engines, vehicles, roads, airports, manufacturing etc needed to make and use internal combustion engines and vehicles? Quite a lot is known about Inca and Egypt civilizations - and it really isn't so very long ago. An engine block or blast furnace should be easy to find as should the roads.

When we are ready as a species maybe we will stop being so gullible.

Re: Ancient Technology & Clay Airplanes

PostPosted: December 21st, 2007, 10:47 pm
by Liv
When we are ready as a species maybe we will stop being so gullible.


I don't think it's gullible. It's exploring possibilities. If we don't ask the questions, we don't have science. Curiosity is apart of rational thought.

Sure... maybe it is a 1920's spark plug. Okay... but if we assume every-time we find a similar item that it's a 1920's spark-plug, then we may never dig a little deeper to find that engine block.... Asking the question can never hurt, and even if this "is" a false alarm, there are "alot" of questions which beg to be answered.

Re: Ancient Technology & Clay Airplanes

PostPosted: December 22nd, 2007, 1:15 am
by A Person
Liv wrote:Curiosity is apart of rational thought.

Of course

Liv wrote:but if we assume every-time we find a similar item that it's a 1920's spark-plug

No don't assume, but don't promote a speculative answer that contradicts known evidence.

'Inca had delta wing aircraft' may be a working hypothesis if evidence of airports, manufacturing annd enginnering facilities were found. It's a huge stretch if the only evidence is ambiguous figures. It would be truly remarkable if that technology existed and the only record were tiny ornaments. I much prefer to say, "we don't know exactly what these figures represent, we need more data", than to leap to a speculative conclusion.

Re: Ancient Technology & Clay Airplanes

PostPosted: December 23rd, 2007, 10:03 am
by Scott
He didn't say that ancients had atomic weapons, he said "How did Democritus discover the atomic structure of atoms half a millennium before the atom was even conceived?" (Thank you Tivo).

Democritus was a student of Leucippus and co-originator of the belief that all matter is made up of various imperishable, indivisible elements which he called atoma (sg. atomon) or "indivisible units", from which we get the English word atom. It is virtually impossible to tell which of these ideas were unique to Democritus and which are attributable to Leucippus.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democritus

Re: Ancient Technology & Clay Airplanes

PostPosted: December 23rd, 2007, 10:10 am
by Liv
You rock, Scott.

Re: Ancient Technology & Clay Airplanes

PostPosted: December 23rd, 2007, 10:43 am
by Nfidel
What if the pyramids are much older then the Egyptians? What if we've destroyed ourselves before because of a Nuclear war? What would that mean for us, as a race who are about to embark upon another nuclear war?


Those are some really cool concepts to ponder. I sometimes wish I were as good a writer as I am a reader and could make something of those ideas. On the other hand, my love of dystopian fiction led me to read Issac Asimov's "Nightfall". Set on a planet with multiple suns, darks skies are only possible once every one thousand years when the suns are in eclipse. Religious shamans and scientists of the planet disagree as to the meaning of the eclipse and archeology has shown that the world experiences a planet-wide conflagration that erases much of the previous civilization's history. This seems to coincide with the timing of the eclipses down through history.

I read "Nightfall" online somewhere, but can't find it now. However, here is a link to an mp3 of the story. Nightfall- at EscapePod

Re: Ancient Technology & Clay Airplanes

PostPosted: January 14th, 2008, 4:22 pm
by Till
"Let's not for a second, lest I be accused of only treating Bible claims skeptically"

How about for a second, we look at the even earlier stories of creation before the bible was written. Let's take a look at the absolute forgery that is the biblical story of creation.

I love the bible beaters who would like nothing more than to discredit anything that the bible says couldn't have happened. Yeah, why don't we just take the word of early Christian leaders, those who ordered texts burned and labeled early technologies that they couldn't grasp as heresy.

How about we just take the word of the church. I mean, it's not like we're 1000 years behind technologically because of them.

Re: Ancient Technology & Clay Airplanes

PostPosted: January 14th, 2008, 4:37 pm
by BecauseHeLives
Ahhh.... another atheist. How nice. :|

Re: Ancient Technology & Clay Airplanes

PostPosted: January 14th, 2008, 6:05 pm
by A Person
Aaaah, another warm welcome from 'love thy neighbor' BecauseHeLives. How nice.

Welcome Till, if you're going to post here you should know that BecauseHeLives is a sock puppet for Liv who uses the name to drive site traffic up - don't take him too seriously.

Re: Ancient Technology & Clay Airplanes

PostPosted: January 14th, 2008, 6:09 pm
by BecauseHeLives
A Person wrote:Aaaah, another warm welcome from 'love thy neighbor' BecauseHeLives. How nice.

Welcome Till, if you're going to post here you should know that BecauseHeLives is a sock puppet for Liv who uses the name to drive site traffic up - don't take him too seriously.


Don't spill da beans Mr Bean!

Re: Ancient Technology & Clay Airplanes

PostPosted: March 21st, 2008, 8:48 am
by neolithic pilot
Don't know why we need to look for complicated answers to all this stuff, just to prove that people in the past were smart, its clear they were. I know that English archeologist Professor Akinson found spark plugs and headlight bulbs at Stonehenge but they were mostly in the ditch around the stones and the car park., dont think they were prehistoric.Check out his book. also I found this http://www.solvingstonehenge.co.uk which seems to make sense to me.

Re: Ancient Technology & Clay Airplanes

PostPosted: March 21st, 2008, 9:42 am
by Liv
I watched a special the other day on Stonehenge... where they found dead welsh at the site... I'm like "That's my peeps! Grandpa built stonehenge!!! Hootie Hoo!"

Re: Ancient Technology & Clay Airplanes

PostPosted: March 31st, 2008, 8:57 am
by JasonGawker
wow, this has been a really interesting thread! thanks everyone for participating. i really appreciate your help etc. you guys really know what you're talking about. has anyone ever seen a robotic fish? or ancient technology inspired by sea animals? i suppose this could serve as great reference - http://www.thereeftank.com/forums/showthread.php?t=110414 - what do you think? do you see it too?

:lol: Jason

Re: Ancient Technology & Clay Airplanes

PostPosted: March 31st, 2008, 9:39 am
by SouthernFriedInfidel
A Person wrote:When we are ready as a species maybe we will stop being so gullible.

You'd like to think that, wouldn't you? :roll:

Re: Ancient Technology & Clay Airplanes

PostPosted: March 31st, 2008, 9:45 am
by SouthernFriedInfidel
Scott wrote:He didn't say that ancients had atomic weapons, he said "How did Democritus discover the atomic structure of atoms half a millennium before the atom was even conceived?"

Democritus did NOT "discover the atomic structure of atoms." He merely engaged in thought experiments and postulated that all matter had to have a basic, "smallest component." He had no data to back up his concept, certainly no idea of charged particles or elementary atoms combining to build molecules or any of that other cool stuff "structural" stuff that was actually discovered only very recently, so far as history goes.