Originals WTF? La Culture Geekery WWJD? The South Blog

The Right to Love

All things awesome.

Postby shannon » Sun Feb 26, 2012 4:22 pm

Julie-doris-day-5175235-504-365.jpg

A heart-broken woman stands quietly in the ICU. Her trembling hand wipes away the tears she’s so desperately trying to hide. She’s attempting to put on a brave face for her love, but they both know that the end is drawing near. They’ve been dedicated to each other for so long that she can’t even imagine what life will be like without her soul mate. She’s never loved anyone else. They were each other’s first love, first kiss and neither one of them have ever sought comfort in the arms of any other. A lifetime of commitment and friendship are about to fade away like a whisper. They’ve traveled the world together, raised a family together, and encouraged each other to achieve greatness, all the while, side by side, hand in hand. Out of all the people in the world, their hearts found each other. She’s the greatest love of her life. Yet, because of the decision by congress, they will never be married.

Across the hallway, surrounded by doctors, a young wife named Rebecca dies. Catastrophically, her husband had beaten and strangled her in a fit of rage. Her life was extinguished by the hands of the man that vowed to protect her. Three years ago, by the State of NC, they had been legally bound as husband and wife in the “sanctity of marriage.” One that was granted to one man and one woman.

Marriage recognized by the government is a privilege not shared equally by all citizens in North Carolina. As a child, no one thinks that they won’t be able to marry when they grow up. Every little girl dreams of the day she’ll marry her one, true love. Yet, this state, like many in our nation, uses a policy of marital discrimination. This country has a terrible past in “separate, but equal.” In some states Civil Unions are performed, but Gay and lesbian couples are not allowed to “legally” marry. In 1996, Congress passed the Defense of Marriage Act. Also known as DOMA, it “is a federal law designed to give states the right to refuse recognition of a same-sex marriage approved by another state. It also defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman for the purposes of federal law.”(Manning, Jason)

Ironically, The 14th Amendment of the Constitution promises that “...No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws” (U.S Constitution).

Even convicted felons on death row have the right to marriage. However, committed same-sex couples are not awarded certain life liberties. Because they are not considered “married” for the purposes of federal law, same-sex families are denied equal benefits and protections granted to heterosexual families. There are 1,138 of these reserved for the legal commitment between one man and one woman.

Even same-sex couples who have been together for 50 years, are not entitled to: Social Security benefits, FMLA, COBRA, pensions, home protection, immigration, nursing home rights, taxation and employee benefits. These loving families encounter inequitable treatment for their children. “Many parents want the right to marriage because it would offer a vital safety net and guarantees protections that unmarried parents cannot provide.” Often couples are not allowed to have a say in medical procedures and are not considered “family” under hospital rules. There have been instances when the surviving member of the couple has no say in funeral arrangements and has no claim to the home that they once shared together. Many companies are unable to conduct necessary business with the “unmarried” partner of the deceased.(HRC.com)

Many nations have stopped marriage discrimination. The Netherlands, Belgium, Spain, Canada, South Africa, Norway, Sweden, Portugal, Iceland and Argentina recognize same-sex marriage, with great success. (Fastenberg, Dan) Here, in this nation, seven states have begun granting marriage licenses to devoted gay and lesbian couples. The integration of more stable gay and lesbian families leads to the creation of a more cohesive community, and on a grander scale, establishes a stable society. This week, the Court of Appeals rejected Proposition 8 in California which previously banned same-sex marriage. Judge Stephen Reinhardt said, “California may not add to their state constitution a provision... to strip gay and lesbians of the right to use the official designation that the state and society give to committed relationships, thereby adversely affecting the status and dignity of the members of a disfavored class.”(CNN.com)

Recognizing same-sex partners as married spouses does not take away any rights, benefits or validation of marriages between one man and one woman. So why and who disfavors this “class”? Those who believe that marriage should strictly be defined as a union between a man and a woman, using procreation and Biblical morality as the reason. Those opposing same-sex marriage claim that allowing gay couples to commit to each other legally threatens the sacred institution of marriage. They state that granting these constitutional rights to same-sex couples, would harm the nation and encourage bestiality, and polygamy. Those who oppose gay marriage also fear for the safety and well being of future generations.

“...People who are gay or lesbian were born, as all humans are , with the capacity to love, and the need to be loved.”(Sullivan, Andrew) As long as something is not interfering with the rights of a particular group, why should it be the business of anyone else? Andrew Sullivan, a writer for Newsweek Magazine, explained regarding the marriage to his husband in a legalized state, “When we finally got married...I did not hear the civilization crumble.” (Sullivan, Andrew) True love is certainly a sacred treasure. To be denied the right to express that level of love and devotion while others are granted the same right is unjust.

The woman in ICU is barely hanging on. She cannot go in peace. She’s scared to let go and leave her family, knowing that they are vulnerable to mistreatment by the system. She’s regretting the fact that they did not get married in a legalized state. They both kept dreaming of that joyous day, when the people of the nation would do what’s right and make sure that all of their citizens were treated equally. Together they dreamt of the day when they were no longer treated as second class citizens. For years they had gorgeous dresses in the closet set aside for that moment when society stopped trying to shame their love. Because people are afraid of change, afraid of “other”, this dream would never come true. They both now realize that it’s too late. Just as the broken-hearted woman bends down to kiss her love on the cheek, she feels the warmth of her last breath. Two hearts have now stopped beating. The hospital staff moves in and tells her, “Excuse me ma'am, you have no business here.”
User avatar
shannon
Fire up the Quattro
 
Posts: 101
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 4:03 pm

Postby Liv » Sun Feb 26, 2012 4:28 pm

clap.gif
clap.gif (168.97 KiB) Viewed 17338 times

Screw hospitals, and heterosexuals.
User avatar
Liv
Imagine What I Believe
 
Posts: 2773
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 6:59 pm
Location: Greensboro, NC

Postby SouthernFriedInfidel » Mon Feb 27, 2012 5:36 pm

I find it worthy of comment that the man who wrote and pushed "Amendment One" onto the North Carolina ballot for this coming May died recently, after an extended illness. Presumably, he was surrounded by his loving family, and the medical care professionals found it "natural" to give his wife and other family members updates, and to follow their wishes, once the man himself lost the ability of self-determination.

And that's as it should be. But of course no one ever bothered to point out to anyone the irony of this man having the comfort of his family surrounding him in his final hours, while he had fought so diligently to deny that same comfort to thousands of his fellow citizens in this state.

I was visiting a friend in South Carolina last month (a Republican, BTW) and mentioned this upcoming vote to her. She said, "Thank goodness we're at least not THAT far backward here in South Carolina." Now that's just so embarrassing...
User avatar
SouthernFriedInfidel
 
Posts: 1770
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 4:54 pm
Location: 5th circle of hell -- actually not very crowded at the moment.

Postby Jamy » Wed Feb 29, 2012 11:22 pm

SouthernFriedInfidel wrote:"Thank goodness we're at least not THAT far backward here in South Carolina." Now that's just so embarrassing...


Embarrassing and SCARY.

My son wrote an editorial about Amendment one that actually ended up being written about by another blogger.
http://www.defshepherd.com/2012/02/12-year-old-autistic-north-carolinian.html

AP try not to be too hard on Max for his "God created us all" comment. :wink:
User avatar
Jamy
 
Posts: 224
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 5:57 pm

Postby A Person » Thu Mar 01, 2012 12:27 am

Well, since you brought it up ...

. I think nobody should be categorized because God created us all and no government law can ever deny that.


Is a poor argument - I find it unpersuasive, as will the anti-gay marriage crowd who don't believe God created us equal in the first place - else why would he create 'defectives' like gays, retards, Muslims and atheists.

Government laws should neither deny nor affirm divine creation, but putting God in there is unnecessary. How about "I think nobody should be categorized because we are all humans capable of love and suffering and no government law should ever deny the first nor cause the second.

Gays are one of us! How can we be so unfair to our own people? Next thing you know they'll try to make a rule about autistic people not being able to marry.


Next thing? Denying people with mental problems the right to marry and forcing sterilisation for 'mental defectives' was standard practice a few short decades ago. Back when abortion, contraception nd mixed race marriages were banned and which we fought to get away from. You know - where Santorum and the Tea Party want to take us back to.

But anyway - kudos to your kid, his heart is in the right place and good for him standing up!
User avatar
A Person
 
Posts: 1741
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Slightly west of the Great White North

Postby Jamy » Thu Mar 01, 2012 12:47 am

I'll be sure to pass on your critiques to him. :wink:

Denying people with mental problems the right to marry and forcing sterilisation for 'mental defectives' was standard practice a few short decades ago. Back when abortion, contraception nd mixed race marriages were banned and which we fought to get away from.


He actually already knows about this, but thinks that with the direction things are going, it might go back to that again...within his lifetime, anyway.
User avatar
Jamy
 
Posts: 224
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 5:57 pm


Return to Geekery



cron