·  News ·  Travel ·  Food ·  Arts ·  Science ·  Sports ·  Advice ·  Religion ·  Life ·  Greensboro · 

Premier- The "Smokeless" Cigarette

by Nfidel | Published on January 22nd, 2008, 9:12 pm | Advice
As I mentioned in another thread, years ago I got my hands on a new type of cigarette that R J Reynolds was about to test market. This area of the country wasn't one of those markets, yet their employees received samples of most new products. I was able to get these from a relative.

The claim was made that the "Premier" cigarettes were cleaner and had less harmful byproducts than a regular cigarette, particularly in second hand smoke, as there was less of it.

Image

The literature states that the tobacco was not burned, but heated, "substantially reducing many of the controversial compounds" in the smoke. While we can't, with our limited resources, test these claims, we can dissect some smokes and see what's inside.

I'm sure the packaging was in much better shape in 1988.
Image

Here is a link to a higher rez photo of what's below, in case you want to read the text inside the lid.
Higher Resolution Photo
There was also a lighter that came in this presentation package but it long ago wandered away from the box.
Image

At first glance you can see there is a difference between these and normal cigs. The filter paper seems to extend halfway down the cigarette, and there is a black cylinder stuck in the end of it.
Image

Here I've made the initial incision in our dissection.
Image

Here I've pulled the insides out of the smoke to better view the mechanisms used to deliver nicotine.
Image

It is my understanding that the cigarette is lit by applying flame to this black end with the holes in it (which we saw poking out the far end of the cigarette).
Image

I suppose when inhaled, the flames entered the shiny metal chamber and either ignited these nodules or caused them to smolder, which in turn would heat the chamber, causing the tobacco to smoke.
Image

All I remember about smoking these is that to me, a heavy smoker at the time, I was left unsatisfied. IIRC, one needed to inhale harder than one would with normal cigarettes.
 
 
When I smoked, I tried a rebranded version of those... NASTY! Couldn't even finish a whole box.
This is our chance to change things, this is our destiny.
January 23rd, 2008, 8:37 am
User avatar
Liv
I show you something fantastic and you find fault.
 
Location: Greensboro, NC
Nfidel wrote:... one needed to inhale harder than one would with normal cigarettes.


Reminds me of trying to drink a McDonald's milkshake through a normal size straw... Veins popping outta your head and neck, and your eyes look something like this --> :shock:

Liv wrote:When I smoked, I tried a rebranded version of those... NASTY! Couldn't even finish a whole box.
blaaaaaaaaaaaaaah
When it is not in our power to follow what is true, we ought to follow what is most probable. –Rene Descartes

I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be. -Douglas Adams
January 23rd, 2008, 9:22 am
User avatar
Serendipitous
This is my world and I am the world leader...pretend.
 
Location: in the now
Liv wrote:When I smoked, I tried a rebranded version of those... NASTY! Couldn't even finish a whole box.


Yeah, from what I remember, these were lacking in taste. More of an aftertaste of a trash fire. Or a burning couch.
January 23rd, 2008, 9:25 am
User avatar
Nfidel
 
I thought it had a very chemical taste. Very foreign.
January 23rd, 2008, 10:01 am
User avatar
Liv
I show you something fantastic and you find fault.
 
Location: Greensboro, NC
It looks like they're going to allow smoking again on the airplanes if you smoke "smokeless" cigs.
September 30th, 2009, 4:48 pm
User avatar
Liv
I show you something fantastic and you find fault.
 
Location: Greensboro, NC

Return to Advice