Skip to main content

New Balance Shoes on fire and in a state of crisis.

What happens when the KKK comes out in support of a brand? New Balance shoes recently found itself in such a dilemma. How did it happen? New Balance, who manufacturers their shoes in the United States and the United Kingdom came out in support of Donald Trump during the election in response to the Trans-Pacific Partnership.

“The Obama administration turned a deaf ear to us and frankly, with President-elect Trump, we feel things are going to move in the right direction,” Matthew LeBretton, New Balance’s vice president of public affairs, told the Wall Street Journal.

The Trans-Pacific partnership obviously helps brands who manufacturer their shoes in foreign countries and import them into the U.S. market. Trump whom has campaigned against such partnerships and who believes that trade restrictions will bolster U.S. jobs and the economy would likely benefit companies like New Balance against their competitors.

It all makes a lot of sense until neo-Nazi and white supremacist, Andrew Anglin announced that New Balance was the "official shoes of white people" and suggests that New Balance shoes should be a part of the official uniform of the KKK.

New Balance responded:
After many people went to the internet to post videos of themselves burning their New Balance Shoes, they made a second post five days later.
But the KKK isn't buying it and claims that New Balance's Twitter page has been hacked trying to denounce the "Republican Agenda".

So now I propose to you, from a crisis communications stand point, is this enough? In my opinion no.
Go to New Balance's website and you'll see nothing but text and products on the main page. Finding actual models requires an image search of their domain. There you will see that New Balance  does use numerous multi-racial models for their sports apparel. So why isn't this the first thing a person sees on the website? As un-politically correct as it may be to suggest forced diversity, why isn't there an ethnically diverse cover-page image on the homepage for everyone to see when they hear of this story (now reported on NPR, CBS and the Washington Times) and visit the website? Why are you not changing the narrative?

There are some more questions too. Sponsorship with pro snowboarders and skateboarders appear to be mostly ethnically white and regardless of intent, it's going to be important for New Balance to reexamine the lens by which the company is viewed going forward.

Considering this crisis has been in play for almost two weeks and there has been very little of a response from the company, it might suggest there was little to no crisis planning in advance. The fact that it has taken this long for someone to upload an image to the website and come up with a cliche of a subtitle ("A shoe of many colors!") that embodies diversity suggests they're taking the wait-and-see approach, which in my opinion is akin to doing nothing but waiting for the fire to burn out and hoping it doesn't burn the house down with it.

This is one of those cases where you must act quickly, come out in front, and make a clear strong message about what your company believes. Words aren't enough, it's actions that need to take place. That VP needs to come out and speak to the media with more than just tweets. Consumers now demand a meaningful statement of regret and an apology that his American company has become the face of anti-American values of inclusion and diversity. That's just day one.

How out of control is this? Reebok is offering free shoes to some people who choose to burn their New Balance shoes. Can it get any worse? Go to Twitter and find Photo-shopped New Balance shoes with everything from swastikas to black shoes that have the racial expletives on them. Yet the official New Balance twitter account still has a pair of shoes dangling as their cover picture with no meaningful message.

Perhaps this is one of the best examples of when you don't get out in front of the crisis, you can't own the message. Right now, the KKK and angry shoes lovers everywhere are controlling the New Balance narrative. The question is when will their public relations department decide to take it back?

Popular posts from this blog

Food Lion: Saying One Thing and Doing Another

Something strange is going on, something's wrong at my local grocer store, a Food Lion. The deli and bakery are missing. Rumors are flying around town as to what's happening. Did the snow storm crush the roof? Is it water damage or is there something more mysterious? As it happens, it's nothing more than continued renovations of the store... but no one told the customers.

In a world of communications where transparency is often the only thing holding your reputation together, not telling the customers anything seems like a little bit of deception. More importantly, why not tell the customers of your super cool improvements coming their way? Before the local townspeople crack completely at their inability to purchase their sliced bologna, I have to wonder if this is poor public relations or something more.

Food Lion is selling it to the media in larger markets (where curious journalists have reached out to the company's media relations) as:
The remodels are part of Foo…

Does Christmas Music Increase Sales?

I'm sitting in a restaurant on Sunday and the music playing over the speakers is a rather obnoxious blend of no name Christmas songs. Playing were knockoff versions of classic songs to deliver us into the spirit of the Holidays, but for myself, it made me want to leave. As I shoveled food into my mouth as quickly as I could, I contemplated that there are likely some people who absolutely hate Christmas and that they find themselves living in complete Hell for about two to three months out of every year. What might seem as blasphemy for those who live in North Pole, Alaska or Santa Clause, Indiana (yes they do exist), is likely Guantanamo style torture for my waitress. There's even a top ten most annoying Christmas song list with Grandma Got Ran Over by a Reindeer topping the charts. I'll admit, perhaps moving Christmas to a leap year schedule would increase the nostalgia for myself. Christmas seems to come too soon these day and there's a reason I feel this way. Busin…

Pepsi Max rebrands itself as Pepsi Zero.

Pepsi Max was designed around the height of Energy Drinks and aimed at the male demographic (aged 20-40) because it was mostly a female demo that drank diet drinks. They even used Jeff Gordan (Nascar driver) as a spokesperson to gain the attention of rugged, testosterone filled guys. It seemed like a good idea. However, with cola sales in decline Pepsi has decided to rebrand Pepsi Max as Pepsi Zero Sugar. The branding still includes "maximum taste" on the can, but clearly they've shifted gears. At least, here in America.

Ironically, while the brand Pepsi Max has struggled with consumers in the U.S., in the European market the brand has outsold it's traditional Pepsi products to become the focus of the company's attention. Yet the market seems to constantly misunderstand Pepsi's message when it comes to branding the product. Often they're giving away cans of Pepsi Max in city centres in Europe with "educators" to spread the gospel of zero calor…